So having watched the debate, I will put in my two cents. I thought Biden did a great job. He constantly hammered home the differences between the tickets, he was lucid, knowledgeable and also genial without being patronizing. He hit hard on the economy and harder on Iraq, and gave a lot of solid soundbites (it is sad that this is important, but these days it really is). Admittedly I did not watch the first 30 minutes, where apparently he was much worse, and based on the fact checking I have seen, he spouted a number of falsehoods, although Palin had more (it is disappointing to me that I am not more upset about this, but such is the state of politics that spouting fewer lies now passes for better. Its sad, lies should be bad no matter how many are told).
Palin was fine, if by fine you mean she was not self-immolating, she showed she could speak fluently and was very "folksy". If by fine you mean that she added something substantive to the discussion, demonstrated a more than cursory knowledge of anything or provided strong support for her ticket, then she was awful. And she spent the whole time rambling, looking at her notes or calling McCain a maverick ... in fact, I found this graphic that basically sums up her debate strategy (from Adennak)

Update - Well, it looks like I was wrong about Fox, at least partially. While the Fox news coverage did make it seem like Palin won the debate, their data say otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment